Mentor-grade feedback. Audit-ready evidence.
Traffic-light feedback per criterion. Longitudinal record. Evidence packs the regulator can audit.
Clear, empathetic language. Patient concerns acknowledged. Patient validated her recent loss within the first three exchanges.
Recognised distress but responded late. Practise earlier intervention — name the emotion within 10 seconds of the cue.
Key details omitted during handover. Review ISBAR framework — Situation and Background were skipped.
Concrete plan with timeframe. Patient repeated back the next step.
Criterion by criterion. Not a single number.
Each light comes with the criterion it scores, the specific moment in the conversation that earned it, and the next step the learner can take. The note your best mentor would write — if they had time for every learner.
Every light is paired with a label, an icon, and a position on the card. Meaning is carried by more than colour alone. Learners using screen readers get the same feedback in the same structure. Greyscale viewers do too.
Green · meets standard
The behaviour was demonstrated to standard. The note names the moment that earned it.
Amber · developing
The behaviour was partially present. The note names what to tighten and how.
Red · critical gap
The behaviour was not demonstrated, or a critical step was missed. The note names what to rebuild.
Progress over time, not single-attempt theatre.
A single OSCE score is a moment. A practice run is a moment. Neither tells you whether the learner is becoming more capable, or whether they got lucky on the day.
Each scenario adds to the learner's record. Trends per criterion show where the learner is improving and where the same gap keeps surfacing. Cohort views show educators where the cohort is shifting — and where it isn't.
Longitudinal uplift, not single-attempt theatre. That's the difference between "they passed" and "they're ready."
A defensible artefact. Not a flat dashboard.
An evidence pack is the learner's record, structured for audit. The format is suitable for the audiences who actually ask for it — accreditor, regulator, funder, internal audit, validation panel. The partner exports; the platform structures.
We claim "evidence pack" deliberately. The category vocabulary in this space is full of vendor synonyms for the same flat dashboard. An evidence pack is something different — sourced score by score, with audit logs underneath. The artefact you hand to a regulator who is asking for proof outcomes were delivered, not for proof a policy exists.
Rubric-aligned, sourced
Every score traces to a criterion. Every criterion traces to a rubric. Every assessor touch is logged.
- The rubric used (versioned)
- The score (per criterion + overall)
- The feedback (mentor-grade notes)
- The recording (with consent)
- The assessor sign-off
Aggregate, trend, validation
The cohort-level view a programme leader, accreditor, or regulator can read in one sitting.
- Aggregate performance per criterion
- Trend across the programme term
- Validation sample with assessor calibration
- Outliers flagged for review
The format the regulator expects
PDF, structured data, or both. Suitable for the audiences who actually ask.
- Accreditor and regulator formats
- Funder reporting structures
- Internal audit packs
- Validation panel briefs
Logs and version control
The audit trail is part of the evidence pack, not a separate report. A record produced eighteen months ago is reviewable in the form it existed at the time.
- Audit log of every score and assessor touch
- Version control on rubrics and scenarios
- Retention aligned to sector regulatory timelines
- Consent and access provenance recorded
The same record reads differently depending on who's asking.
Role-appropriate views. The audit trail is the same in each.
Learner view
Feedback to act on. Plain-language summary. Optional reflection prompt.
- Scenarios completed
- Scores earned, per criterion
- Trends across the record
- The next thing to practise
Assessor view
Full rubric detail. Conversation transcript. Calibration data alongside.
- Criterion-by-criterion scoring
- Calibration vs peers and historical norms
- Agree, disagree, or annotate before sign-off
- Conversation transcript and recording
Regulator view
The exported evidence pack. Sourced, versioned, defensible.
- Every score sourced to a criterion
- Every criterion sourced to a rubric
- Every assessor touch logged
- Reviewable as the rubric existed at the time
Feedback the learner can act on. Right after the scenario.
The card the learner sees the moment the conversation ends. Criterion by criterion. The moment that earned each score. The concrete next step.
Optional reflection prompt before the next scenario starts. Optional sharing with a tutor, supervisor, or case manager — controlled by the learner.
How governance protects the recordLook at one. Understand the export.
The fastest way to understand what the partner exports is to look at a sample pack — anonymised, structured, ready to read.